How to discuss a statement
NESA defines it as: “Identify issues and provide points for and/or against.”
Discuss asks you to weigh an idea, not simply defend it. NESA wants points 'for and/or against', which means the marker expects you to see more than one side before you land your position. The trap is treating a discuss question as a one-sided case; the skill is holding the complexity and still arguing a clear line.
New here first? Start with breaking down the whole question, then come back for this.
Weigh both sides, then commit
A discussion is not a debate that ends in a draw. You genuinely consider the other reading, then argue why yours is stronger.
- 1
Name the tension
State the real two-sidedness in the statement, so the marker sees you understand what is being contested.
- 2
Test each side
Give the opposing reading its strongest evidence, then answer it with stronger evidence and analysis of your own.
- 3
Resolve
Argue a clear line through the tension. A discuss question still needs a thesis that lands a position.
A discussion that never lands a view reads as fence-sitting, which quietly caps your mark.
The shape of the paragraph
The paragraph concedes, then turns. It gives the other reading its due, then shows why the text finally supports yours.
Topic sentence (concede, then turn)
Open with a claim that acknowledges the tension and signals your line: 'While the text appears to suggest X, it finally shows Y.'
Watch out:Do not hide your position to seem balanced. Balance is in the evidence you weigh, not in refusing to decide.
The other reading
Give the opposing view its strongest single piece of evidence, briefly and fairly.
Watch out:Represent it honestly. A straw man you knock over too easily convinces no one.
Your reading
Answer with stronger evidence and full analysis, climbing to effect, meaning and purpose.
Watch out:This is where the real analysis lives, so give it more weight than the concession.
Return line
Resolve the tension in the question's terms, stating the position the weighing has earned.
Watch out:Land the judgement clearly, rather than trailing off with 'both sides have a point'.
A model paragraph, labelled sentence by sentence
Here is the structure at work. Read the paragraph straight through first: it should sound like one continuous argument, not a checklist. Then read the label beside each sentence to see the job it is doing. It is written to support this thesis:
The thesis
While The Crucible appears to blame a handful of malicious individuals for Salem's tragedy, Miller ultimately locates its cause in a community that lets private vengeance masquerade as public justice.
The paragraph, read straight through
It is tempting to read the tragedy of Salem as the work of a few wicked people, yet Miller steadily widens the blame from the individual to the community that empowers them. There is real evidence for the narrower view, since Proctor himself insists that private malice drives the trials when he warns that “vengeance is walking Salem”, and the personification does name individual spite as the engine of the accusations. But Miller pushes past personal villainy toward collective failure, for when Proctor rages that “common vengeance writes the law”, the metaphor indicts a whole legal and religious order that has dressed revenge as righteousness, so that the guilt belongs less to any single accuser than to a society willing to believe them, an argument aimed squarely at the conformity of Miller's McCarthy-era America. The play thus resists the comfort of blaming a few, insisting instead that hysteria takes hold only when a community consents to it.
It is tempting to read the tragedy of Salem as the work of a few wicked people, yet Miller steadily widens the blame from the individual to the community that empowers them.
There is real evidence for the narrower view, since Proctor himself insists that private malice drives the trials when he warns that “vengeance is walking Salem”,
and the personification does name individual spite as the engine of the accusations.
But Miller pushes past personal villainy toward collective failure, for when Proctor rages that “common vengeance writes the law”, the metaphor indicts a whole legal and religious order that has dressed revenge as righteousness,
so that the guilt belongs less to any single accuser than to a society willing to believe them, an argument aimed squarely at the conformity of Miller's McCarthy-era America.
The play thus resists the comfort of blaming a few, insisting instead that hysteria takes hold only when a community consents to it.
Every quotation above is verbatim from The Crucible (Arthur Miller) and verified against the source text.
See it done on your own paragraph
Paste your essay and we will show you, sentence by sentence, where your writing stops short, and rewrite your own lines toward Band 6. Free, about a minute.
Mark my essay — free →The other key words
Back to all the key words, or learn the techniques that give you something to write about.
The definition is quoted from NESA's Glossary of Key Words. The structure, teaching and model paragraph are our own, aligned to the 2017 English Advanced syllabus (2019–2026 prescriptions).